Reviewers for sport games dont often play with Madden 20 coins them the exact same way users do. Rarely are the going to be in a long running CFM to observe glitches over time such as development failings or idle reused super bowl images. And they generally aren't playing online so that they do not see people cheesing broken plays at them 35 times per game. They simply play through the story mode, play a couple of games in single Madden player franchise, take a look at the other modes like MUT or Draft Champions, then post the review.
You are basically looking at people thta don'treally play sports games attempts to review sports matches. That is why they put so much weight on franchise style since the actual on field game head to mind is just way too complicated for general gamers at this stage but the idea of mangaging salaray and roster is a far more recognizable concept which may be easily moved from other matches.
Granted I get operating at EA has to be a soul beating and boring experience in game development, together with reviewers looking at the same mundane game over and over for years and slapping a 8/10 using a"headed in the right direction tag" and"looks great from here for franchise and MUT lovers". But could anybody attempt to care at this point on either front, I am certain that you'd lose money for stating"Yeah the actual Madden participant movement went from being total dog shit to cheap Mut 20 coins working game mechanic in a year, but outside of that Maddenplay feels the same in 16 and thus does franchise with a situation engine they will"upgrade during the year".
