Q using the Authors of A New Culture of Learning
The economic future of the nation depends on how well we educate our children. At a time when the US doesn't even rank in the top 30 countries available in education status, We are fortunate to undertake a new book: By Douglas jones and John Seely Brown(CreateSpace, 2011).
The novel is a short, Clear and profound all fun qualities in a book. Just as in management where we need to make an essential shift from push to pull, So in learning, The book shows why we need to make a shift from teaching to learning and how to pull off it.
1. In it, You make out two senses of culture. One is the culture of the educational setting, Where stability and of a routine is the norm. An additional is a culture that is analogous to what a scientist grows in a petri dish in a lab. It takes place under controlled conditions, There is however very little foreknowledge of what will result. Here the whole point of the experiment is not to intervene to control the actual end result, But let the culture grow in an organic way. In the new culture of teaching, Which draws attention this second type of culture, Come to a decision verify what students are learning?
One of the things which we believe has really been holding education back has been a very backward model of understanding assessment. When you treat guidance like a machine, Your principal interest is efficiency: Is the appliance functioning smoothly? So we actually assign numbers to solutions: 72% nicely 95%, While, Bull crap, And consequently Cs. But if you ask anyone what their worthwhile and life changing educational experience was, Rarely do they're"An hour or two I got an A in my sophomore physics class,
Oakley Sunglasses Discount, The moments of learning that affect us most deeply are often unexpected and deeply surprising.
The other problem we see in the present state of education is that answers carry more weight than questions, Which we feel is exactly backwards. Answers are really easy to assess or verify. Some difficulties are trickier. But of these two, Questions are far critical. In similar, For the other hand, That it is also easy to assess questions as well. And we actually can tell what students are learning by concerns they ask. Your, Maybe more so than by keeping them spout out answers.
In our checking system, There usually is just one answer for every question. But if we turnaround for the priorities, It turns out there is a mass of questions that can be raised by working on any interesting problem.
We feel the leaders of the 21st century are the ones who can ask the best questions and drive things forward. The kinds of questions we are talking about lead to outcomes and those also provide a kind of verification as to whether concerns are good ones or not.
2. You say this new type of learning comes about without books, Without teachers and without classes. Yet near someone saying classrooms are obsolete or that teaching no longer matters. Are usually role of classrooms and teachers in the new culture of learning?
We very much see classrooms and teachers as a critical the main new culture of learning, But not as part of their current state. The learning we see happening all around us is bypassing teachers and classrooms because those institutions are stuck in the old ways of thinking and are ill equipped to handle a world of constant change. It is not an important outcome, Yet still. As there are it, Classrooms and teachers should really play a critical role in the new culture of learning, As they are things that create what we discuss as a"Bounded learning location, Within your sense, Both the role of the teacher and the earth of the classroom need to change, But the alterations are relatively minor. The knowledge we came to is that it isn't our schools that are failing: It is our theory of knowing how that is failing. Once we rethink what it means to learn in a manner that is based on passion, Creativity, Issue and questing, It becomes easy to reshape sessions to those goals. One of the finest shifts for teachers is moving into a role of mentorship and guidance, Which has frequently been the role of teachers throughout history.
3. Some traditionalists would argue that there must be still be a core curriculum of math and speaking skills and that unless students master these basic skills, They it's still unable to cope with the future. Don't you agree? Is this something which requires the old teacher/classroom approach?
A big part of what is missing in schools today is a link to the passion and desire to learn. If you watch a small child explore our world, They needn't be told to study, Present, Play or learn; They do it certainly. Schools today to become insistent on dividing work and play, Holding them out as opposites and limiting play to a 40 minute break in the day called"Recessed,
Oakley Sunglasses Sunglasses Brands, One of the things we think is a vital about the new culture of learning is that play be seen as a critical part of all learning. Learning the guidelines of a game is boring, Tedious and time intensive if you aren't interested in playing it. If youngsters see those basic skills as the"Rules of the table action" That make them play, Mastering them acquires a completely new meaning. We have witnessed often kids mastering all kinds of"Basic achievements" As they quite simply were being put in the service of a deeper passion.
4. Traditionalists could be suspicious as to how much students are learning by hanging out on line. You yourself separate"Lurking, "Playing around" And as a result"Geeking offered, Each with a rising level of learning. "Geeking along with" Is the richest and most rigorous kind of the three learning feels. Can i know which mode students are in,
Cheap Oakley Sunglasses For Men, Or even whether or not they ever get beyond hanging out?
The research we draw on for it came from the work of Mimi Ito and her team at the MacArthur Foundation's program in Digital Media and Learning. This was an amazing ethnographic project documenting precisely what kids today are actually doing with their time online. What we were trying to do was build off of that work and try to determine what kind of learning is happening in those different modes and how they embrace the idea of change.
A big part of the idea of hanging out is that this is where people gain a lot of information at the tacit level. When we think of an advanced campus, Most of the benefit we get from being at a school comes from exactly that practice: Standing around. The best lectures are things that prompt students to continue discussions and debates after class ends. You have talks, Demonstrations, Services and clubs,
Buy Wholesale Oakley Sunglasses, And discussion posts. Classes really are essential, Little doubt, But they work best as fodder for an expanded view of learning that is about immersing yourself in a culture where discussion and listening to advice from the people around you matters too.
Going out is not simply relaxing and taking it easy, It is immersing yourself in a new context and focusing on how that context shapes and creates meaning. Those skills will undoubtedly be increasingly important for the 21st century, So I think we need to be careful not to underestimate value of hanging out in the way we talk about it.
As for being aware of what stage people are in, Ito does a highly skilled job of analyzing and documenting those things, So they seem to have been very easy to identify and understand.
5. Some traditionalists may possibly argue, "Pain free, No getting, That unless students are forced to battle with difficult issues, They are unlikely to hone their intelligence. Yet you reason that learning must be fun and playful. Is there any operate in the new culture of learning?
There is not a question that learning can be a painful experience. But we need to understand that play can be serious and challenging as well as fun and joyful. I think we err in assuming that learning needs to be painful to function and our current system seems to presume that learning isn't happening if there is no suffering.
Consider two people. One dreads his calculus housework, Finds it dull and tedious or painful. He works 3 hours a night solving issues that he finds pointless. An additional absolutely loves math, Considers it a passion and looks forward to putting away a few hours a night to work on calculus problems, Especially ones absolutely challenge her.
Which of those two is considered honing their intellect? You find something that a student is keen about and they will find the difficult issues on their own, They will push very own, Overall health, wellness proper guidance and resources, They will learn how to ask the sorts of questions that will make their interest last a lifetime, Really not a semester.
6. You stress the need for cultivating the imagination. You argue in the book that inducing students to ask the right questions can be crucial than having the right answers. How will you assess whether students have asked the right questions?
This actually is easier than it sounds. We tend to forget that the roots of modern education under western culture have their start in the Socratic method, That is all about questions and seldom about answers. We all tend to know a good question when we hear one and sometimes, If we are posed with one that challenges us, We will pause and allow it with a statement such as"Amazing! Good hesitation, So at an interesting level, We all know very well what constitutes a good question.
In a recently available class, Associated with us(Doug) Gave a quiz to his university. Because asking for an answer to a question, He simply posed treatment plans. "If you wanted to know if someone got nevertheless point of this book, What question do you ask them, All of the class was spent having each student pose their question for class discussion. The discussion and debate about what the best questions were was far more joining or revealing than having them all answer the same question would have been.
Area of the point we try to make in the book is that inquiry is not about asking a"Straight" Consider, But it is a process of asking ever more better questions. And I think we would say that the best questions are the brains behind ignites a student's passion and cultivates their imagination. And it is very easy to tell when that is going on. When students have passion and keenness, It is contagious and impossible to hide.
7. How ready for launch are the ideas in the book? An example,
2011 Oakley Sunglasses, Do we still need to figure how to measure the progress of learning in this new, Less structured enviromentally friendly, With a lot of testing still needed? Or do we have an acknowledged body of experience that can be applied immediately?
What makes a new culture of learning exciting is that you can easliy take the very best elements that have always existed in learning(Back to the time of Greek education and the polis up to the one room school house) And find a way to make it available to everyone. What we have is the concept of a one room school house that scales to a global world with an almost unlimited set of resources of"Rich food" To give depth that has never previously been possible in any learning destination.
Once you make a shift in thinking to putting basic points first, Any devices sort of spills out of the idea. Our colleagues wrote us a note that he sat down and read the book cover to cover one night. In the morning, He completely updated his class around the principles in the book and has the best class of the semester. In this case, We are indicating less than 12 hours to put our ideas into the classroom.
There are also some real opportunities here to add mass to what we describe as learning collective, Which have very different properties than communities or classical institutions.
相关的主题文章：
