Except JJ Arcega-Whiteside had 99 acc and Mut 21 coins Alshon just went to practice style with two receivers with height and weight along with evaluations had 0. Alshon on the best is about one step short of where Arcega-Whiteside is on his side of the area. This was All-pro with pace parity. Here's the image in reference. JJ feels smoother coming out of juke moves, Alshon requires a few seconds longer hitting his second gear than JJ does while perhaps not sprinting. Interesting! I'm guessing they are running In paths here? Do their path running ratings compare? In getting the players run in a straight line my aim was supposed to eliminate as many variables as possible, but it seems like I'll have to make a followup video to check into a great deal of things!
I am pretty sure I just see the difference with RBs. Low Acc RBs don't have second/third equipment and it shows when they get hawked down on extended runs.I always felt like my taller backs become caught less frequently. Idk it just believes that way.Someone mentioned elevation being a factor in the YouTube remarks, I certainly think I will have to look at a video that is upcoming! Take my word for it, my large 6 ft encircle with 90 90 acceleration and even speed get captured less then a Phillip Lindsey kind back. But that is only if they reach full stride.
Testing players running a route doesn't use acceleration evaluations as far as the release evaluations are used by it. Yeah that's what I thought, he has ta factor in launch, cause as a RB Henderson has a RLS, and if DRR variables in on 9 routes too I wonder. That is a good point, I never thought about that. However, do publish evaluations apply? I will be honest I am not 100% certain what discharge evaluations do, but according to one consumer on Google:"Release is how successful your receivers (RB/WR/TE) are against media coverage. The greater your launch score, the better you are able to beat press coverage." Came here to state this as well. if anything I'd assume the HB would make it later on a path. It truly matters when you have ball in hand and you also do some jukes ect.
I conducted a test a couple of months ago and reached a decision. Yes you are right that you aren't going to be able to discern the difference between a man with like 87 accel and 95 accel with the speed. But if you do a test between two guys keeping everything else constant with one participant with 1 acceleration as well as the other there is a difference. That you will definitely be able to discern the difference, in the event that you go to enjoy 70 vs 99 accel. Of course thats entirely impractical and would not ever be something you'd experience, but to say acceleration evaluations are"literally meaningless" is a bit of a reach. I agree they don't mean that much though.
I appreciate the feedback guy! It is likely worth look into later on, although I guess it never crossed my mind to correct the player ratings to test the ends of the spectrum. With respect to 70 vs 99 accel, that was really why I demonstrated we can forecast the separation completely based on their pace, even though their acceleration ratings were 24 points apart and set the Tyreek Hill vs Nick O'Leary evaluation in there. But you're correct, a more accurate name would probably be"acceleration ratings have a negligible impact", but that is not likely to buy Madden nfl 21 coins grab people's attention as easily!
