As before, some objects could possibly be perturbed and dislodged and fall into their sun, or be thrown from the gravitational control of that sunlight altogether and leave in to place and an unhappy, endless night, existence. Also, the ejection process is likely to be alive and properly in binary (tug of war) star techniques (and you can find an awful ton of these about).
While there's nothing to be claimed for anyone sad bodies (and life forms - if any) that get cataclysmically within their parent suns, it's not quite 'The End' for those now sunless orphans. There could be multi-thousands (or more) of orphaned planets (of all sizes and makeup) in serious place beyond the brilliant gentle and solar power of a sun. There might be an orphan world inside a mild year of us and we'n never know or کمک به خیریه.
Can orphan planets kind all independently in the depths of alone place? Effectively, in case a large interstellar dust and gasoline cloud may gravitationally fail to form a star(s) and related exceptional (solar) program, I fail to see why a smaller interstellar dust and gas cloud couldn't fail to create a planet measured object, probably a 'failed star' such as for instance a Jupiter, maybe with moons.
From that needless to say it is simple to extrapolate and recommend such a Jovian 'failed star' could have smaller abodes (planets) sort and orbit same - a not quite unseen solar system. Or maybe it's just an orphan world with associated moons. Both description amounts to a similar thing - a rose by some other title applies. Aside from original source, mainstream knowledge indicate why these orphans must be lifeless, even though before the event they'd life.
When I was a senior high school biology student (1962-63), it was definitely gospel (and no communication would be joined in to contrary) that our sun was the be all and end all of the existence of terrestrial life. Number sun; number life. All life ultimately depended on photosynthetic plants which in turn couldn't occur without sunlight. Actually then nevertheless I seem to remember speculation (Carl Sagan?).