If anything, we ought to Animal Crossing Bells be dropping the usernames/handles of those users that made the dangers or mad accusations, instead of merely blanket blaming an whole site.Poor or no neighborhood moderation leads to quickly escalating discourse as people squander their power mobilizing against idiots, trolls, or bad faith actors whose remarks have been awarded the exact same algorithmic weight others. I believe that it's absolutely a structural issue, and doxing or harassing the individuals involved, even when they had been shitty, doesn't correct the issue of the"vigilante justice" cultural standards Twitter's construction created, it merely makes those problems worse.
It is entirely feasible to encourage or suppress behavior via algorithmic choices, and now these websites know that. Emotional investment generates"involvement", so that's what is focused on.
By directing competitive posts into an audience which will get riled up, upvote, and respond using their own, it both provides Pavlovian reinforcement and normalizes the behavior... while continuing to drive up display time.
Contrast if you steer the identical post to an average slice of people, in which case it's more likely to Nook Miles Ticket For Sale get downvoted and advised to become a racist jerk. At which point the user is unhappy and leaves, but generally does the behaviour less.Eh, there's certainly discussion about how those elaborate fonts may be hell for b/vi folks because screenreaders/text-to-speech programs struggle together 'Fifi' in that font would be read as'scientific letter , scientific correspondence , scientific correspondence , scientific correspondence I' and if you have your full bio as that font it'd get old really fast.
